Print Edition

Share it

Add to: JBookmarks Add to: Facebook Add to: Windows Live Add to:  FAV!T Social Bookmarking Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icoi.us Add to: Slashdot Add to: Yahoo Add to: Diigo Add to: Newsvine Add to: Google
Features
Election special: Last year’s promises, kept or not? PDF Print
Written by Kate Palmer   

Two terms in, Kate Palmer finds out whether this year’s sabbatical officers have lived up to the election promises they made last year.

When voting, it’s easy to be swayed by utopian ideals set out in the glossy manifestos forced upon us during campaigning season. In a bid to gain votes, it seems nominees will promise almost anything to secure a much-coveted office in House Six. Now we are almost halfway through the academic year, Trinity News plans to look back at the promises of our current sabbatical officers, and decipher what was a realistic policy-pledge from pure electioneering.
Students’ Union President Cónán Ó Broin has undoubtedly made good his promise to fight fees, which he says have been at the “forefront” of his campaign. “It’s been an awful lot of work”, Ó Broin tells Trinity News, “It’s taken three and a half months of work, lobbying every TD and Senator. Together with the Students’ Union Presidents of UCD and DIT we’ve met with over 40 politicians on the matter”. Ó Broin describes the successful prevention of tuition fees as “sheer euphoria”, in a campaign which has put the Students’ Union into the national limelight. However, this is not the first time fees have been on the Government’s agenda, as with a previous scare in 2002, and Ó Broin admits there is a “strong prospect” the issue may arise again. “The fact is, that the University is under funded by the Government, but it is unacceptable to assume tuition fees are the answer to this”.
Ó Broin’s work is by no means done, as the Students’ Union President is currently embroiled in a conflict with the University over the expenditure of the 1,500 Student Charge. Ó Broin explains, “only about 800 of the registration fee students pay actually goes on student services. Students are simply being charged for cuts the Government have made, and the College are trying to justify the rise in the registration fee by changing the definition of “student services” to include facilities such as the Library and ISS Services”. He describes the actions of the College as a “deception”, and is organising meetings with the Provost in order to solve what he describes as an “abuse by the Minister for Education and Minister for Finance, with millions of students’ money in question”.
Pressing demands in what Ó Broin calls the “toughest and most challenging” year to be part of the Students’ Union means he has not been able to promote Irish culture in Trinity as much as planned. He sees the installation of moveable GAA posts onto the Cricket pitch as “symbolic” event for Trinity College, which he says “proves that the stereotypical image of Trinity and stereotypical image of GAA are not necessarily incompatible”.
Both Students’ Union President and Education Officer, Ashley Cooke, have been at the forefront of the campaign for improved Library services. Success on the Library front has yet to be seen, as Sunday opening hours remain a point of contention. Cooke made promises to improve Library services back in 2008, and admits it is a situation which has left students “unhappy and angry with the current circumstances”. He explains the recruitment moratorium has been a major setback in the campaign, although is confident it is an issue he will “not give up on”, and expects Sunday opening hours to be operational over the next coming weeks.
Somewhat less ambitious, although infinitely more successful, was Cooke’s election promise to reform the grinds system in Trinity. The previous system involved e-mailing a page of contacts to individuals interested in getting or giving tuition, which was out of date and unreliable. Cooke has created an online database for which he has received a number of testimonials: “Lecturers have come up to me around College, telling me how useful the system is, and one of them even thanked me for the help it had given to their son. It’s something that not enough people knew about before, and I hope I’ve helped people who needed that tuition”, says Cooke. He has also made moves to ensure a 24-hour study space is available on-campus, although he says the lack of bathroom facilities and no access to books means it is “not enough”. He continues, “although we don’t have an adequate facility now, when the proposed student centre comes along, we are promised a 24-hour study space”, in reference to a proposed development in Luce Hall which has not yet received planning permission.
The proposed student centre has been part of an unfulfilled election promise of Entertainments Officer, Mick Birmingham. His 2008 manifesto says it is “ridiculous that we don’t have a venue for student gigs”, although now Birmingham admits the reality is “a little more difficult than it might seem”. He argues the new term structure has made it difficult to employ staff for a 24-weeklong academic year, and explains how the plans have been “rejigged” to double the capacity to 800. “I’ll say the student centre won’t be long off the ground”, assures Birmingham, “it will be up by the next time the Provost comes along, although if they say it’ll be ready in the summer we should probably expect it around January the next year!”
Trinity has yet to see an off-license on campus, although Birmingham assures this is an election promise which has not yet been broken. “It’s something the Junior Dean isn’t exactly thrilled about. It’s important in a position like this to pick your battles”, say Birmingham, who says it is important to avoid “pissing off people you need to have on your side”. Students have yet to see a Night Bus service provided by the Ents Office, and Birmingham explains the license fees associates with a regular bus service makes it a “lot more complicated and expensive than I first envisaged”.
The year is not up yet however, and Birmingham assures students he has “got a lot more to do” for the rest of his sabbatical, and “the exam season can give me a change to dot the ‘i’s and cross the ‘t’s”. Perhaps we can expect a lot more from Birmingham’s tenure, as after all, the biggest College event of the year has yet to take place. “The Trinity Ball is my biggest achievement so far”, says Birmingham, who has did not reveal the lineup.
“Welfairie” Cormac Cashman has mainly lived up to his election promises, so much so that he is running for a second tenure. The Welfare Officer promised in his “Need a hug?” campaign an accommodation advisory service, and help with student finance. Cashman describes the Accommodation Advisory Service as a “huge success”, enabling “three times as many students to get a place through the College service”. He tells Trinity News that countless students have come to his office for help with budgeting and financing, or just to have a “shoulder to cry on”. Cormac’s promise to introduce a Welfare week is planned for this March’s Mental Health Awareness Week, which is set to include free fruit every morning and ‘stress pigs’ for the overworked student. Cashman also plans to make a number of additions to SHAG Week, including a full-time pharmacists on campus, which will take place later this term.
Rob Donohoe has transformed the role of Deputy President to become Communications Officer. Scrapping the controversial Record, he is founder of The University Times, a Students’ Union funded broadsheet newspaper. Donohoe tells us how he was “thrown in the deep end” when his sabbatical position began: “When I started as editor for the University Times, I didn’t know a lot about what’s involved with editing a paper”, says Donohoe, “I thought the best idea was to change the direction of the paper, I didn’t want to just modify The Record because you’re always going to have the baggage of the old paper.” Donohue enlisted the help of Gearoid O Rourke, previous Trinity News Editor and designer to make the newspaper a success.
Donohoe was keen to reverse the policy of erstwhile Students’ Union newspaper, The Record, which banned criticism of the Union. He comments: “I don’t think The University Times is biased at all”, and says he has “no problem with reporting on anything which may be perceived as portraying the Students’ Union in a negative light”. Donohue describes his fellow sabbatical officers as “supportive” of the independence of the paper. “At the same time, I don’t just put in fluff about positive things the Union has done, and in that sense only include news into the paper”. Donohue describes his position as a “dual role”, combining that of a sabbatical officer and Editor, “I need to be independent, but also take some input from the Union. Sometimes I let my input as Communications Officer seep into an editorial role, because in the Union I might come across something newsworthy!”
Donohoe is evidently proud of his creation, which he describes as a “work in progress”. He says, “the paper has been improving with every issue that’s come out, and we’re going to keep getting better with the next one, and one after that!” Donohoe hopes The University Times will be available to students in years to come, “I hope people will remember that I founded it”, he adds.
“The main piece of advice I’d give for someone taking over the role of Communications Officer would be to make sure there’s continuity with staff on the paper”. Says Donohoe. He comments on the element of uncertainty surrounding the new publication during Michaelmas term: “I know how hard it is when starting from scratch, and the first issues were particularly tough because there weren’t many staff at all. Maybe this was because people would not know what to expect from the paper or didn’t expect it to change that much.”
“I hope that the paper can continue in the same light under next year’s Communications Officer. I’d hate to see the paper go in a completely different direction every year, although at the same time I recognise that each Editor would want to make his or her own mark”.
It seems this year’s sabbatical team have got on well so far without any major disagreements. “In this way I’m personally blessed”, says Ó Broin, who points out that he and Ashley Cooke have been working closely together on the ongoing campaign for improved Library opening hours. Rob Donohoe says, “It’s been fantastic working with the other sabbatical officers, we all get on well”, pointing out that he lives with Mick Birmingham, and “we have all agreed on a lot of things. You know how it can be when there’s a weak link, it can let the team down, but we didn’t have that”.
As ever, some of the more grandiose issues of our sabbatical team have of yet failed to materialise. However, we should not let that overshadow the achievements of a Union which has represented, informed, supported and entertained the student body to which it is accountable. The national profile of Trinity’s Students’ Union makes it all the more important that we, the student electorate, choose a candidate most equipped for a position where impracticable daydreams rarely become reality.

 
Election Special: Canidate Profiles PDF Print
Written by Election Team   
For our presidential candidates' profiles, click here.

Education

Jennifer Fox

Jennifer Fox acknowledges that the role of Education Officer is “not full of glamorous policy”. She pledges to make the Students’ Union approachable, and improve student services by introducing a College Virtual Learning Environment.  “I don’t think we have the top services in Ireland” she explains, “there’s so much red tape”.
Fox intends to make the Students’ Union more “accessible, approachable and accountable” by introducing regular clinics for officers, held away from the “ivory tower” of House 6. This “has to happen for the integrity of the SU campus-wide” she says, aiming to overcome a perception that the Union is elitist.
The Senior Sophister Genetics student claims she knows what it is like to be “outside the ‘SU bubble’”, but currently sits on the Union Education Committee.
Fox describes current Education Officer Ashley Cooke as “a friend”, and her opinion of Cooke’s administration is high. She considers him to be achieving his manifesto promises with success.  Her plans to make the Union more approachable, Fox says, are “absolutely not” an appraisal of the current Education Officer’s performance.  “Ashley has done a fantastic job” she added, “I would want to maintain this”.
On the subject of Trinity Library opening hours, Fox admits that a speedy resolution of the problem seems unlikely. The issue of Library cuts, she says, “has plagued sabbatical officers for years”.
“I would love to introduce a modern, personalised, effective “virtual learning environment” such as Moodle or Blackboard. A new, easy-to-use system would increase the amount of online notes, reading lists, references for specific courses as well as encourage the use of modern technology such as podcasts and video links provided by lecturers”, says Fox. When asked if the online availability of course material could be controversial among academic traditionalists, Fox says, “the VLE wont do your degree for you, nothing replaces a book”. In response to fellow Education Officer nominee Dave Preston, Fox comments, “education shouldn’t be gimmicky”.

Dave Preston

Dave Preston says suggestions that he is a ‘joke’ candidate is “slander” propogated by a Students’ Union which “robbed” him of success when he ran for the office of President last year. Canvassing for the role of Education Officer, Preston does not consider it to be a consolation prize. He insists that the position of Students’ Union President is “a puppet role”, considering the Education Office to be the actual seat of power.
The Junior Sophister student of Philosophy and Classics is a vehement supporter of tuition fees, insisting that their re-introduction would help to advance Trinity’s public image as a “bastion of Protestantism”.
“We do not need handouts from the Irish government” he explains. “We are not Maynooth. We don’t fly the Irish flag, there’s a good reason for that.”
Preston says he and his campaigners aim to redress Trinity’s “parody of itself”, donning suits and top hats. The nominee claims that fees would help to re-establish College’s Anglo-Saxon heritage which has been allowed to “slip by the wayside”. When asked if he was in receipt of free fees, Preston evaded comment.
Preston expresses interest in Students’ Union President nominee Dan Reilly’s Trinity Intellectual Traditionalist Society, envisaging “we’d have a lot to talk about”.
In a departure from his Presidential promise last year to “fuck cricket”, Preston now intends to make the sport compulsory among students. He is openly critical of the “‘Angela’s Ashes’ food” provided by the Buttery and says he would replace this with weekly venison.
Confident his election proposals are “in the bag”, Preston says he is prepared for the role of Education Officer, citing his experience in the underground “Shadow Union” he formed after failing to secure the Students’ Union Presidency last year. He assumes full responsibility for another semester without dinosaur attacks and professes to take a vigilant stance with “knackers” who cut across campus to get to the Dart.

Welfare

Cormac Cashman

In a surprise bid for re-election, Welfare Officer Cormac Cashman wants to secure the “job I love, even on the bad days”, for another year’s tenure. Cashman says he has the distinct advantage of “knowing the ropes, which can take about three months”, over a sabbatical officer coming in for the first time, and “the network of contacts I’ve built up over the past year gives an element of continuity to the position, which can be made difficult because of the short tenure”.
Cashman hopes to build upon his organisation of Welfare events including Mental Health Awareness Week, Rainbow Week and SHAG week. He cites his creation of an accommodation advisory service as a “huge success”, which he says “housed at least 60 Trinity students, and made sure students could get a place more cheaply and easily”.
Cashman has also been involved in assisting students with budgeting and managing their finances, by advising them on the grant system and providing charts, which he says is “essential in the current economic climate”.
The grants system is something which Cashman would be keen to reform, and if elected would lobby to change the current system which he says is “not tenable, it needs to be centralised because currently there are thirty different bodies administering grants, and students aren’t given access to enough information”.
Cashman says it is “unacceptable” that students in receipt of grants did not receive the funds until as late as January, forcing them to pay months of rent without any financial assistance.
The student in BESS says it can be “daunting when you’re finding your feet as a sabbatical officer”, and advises incoming Students’ Union officers to “get as much as a cross over between officers as you can, so that there can be a transfer of experience and knowledge”.

Stephanie Fleming

Physiotherapy student Stephanie Fleming feels she can make a “tangible difference” if elected Welfare Officer. She says her course makes her a “very passionate person in caring for others”, and the Welfare Office is an extension of this.
The final year student has been active in the Students’ Union for three years now, and has been a class representative. She is currently Deputy Convenor for the Health Sciences faculty and a member of the Welfare Committee.
Fleming wants the Welfare Office to be as approachable as possible, as a position designed to “help the student body”. She is keen on promoting issues such as mental health, which is she feels still has not reached the forefront of the Welfare agenda. Fleming also wants to further promote Rainbow Week, and revive Road Safety Week in Trinity.
Fleming aims to address the underutilisation of services available to students. “There is a shortfall in the use of services”, says Fleming, “the information on the Student Counselling Service website, for example, is routinely out of date and as such is fatal in helping students to reach out”. Fleming points out that the opening hours of Niteline are stated incorrectly on advertisement posters.
Fleming seeks to give a hand to the peer mentor programme, which she aims to expand to all faculties and course.
When asked about the performance of the current Welfare Officer and fellow nominee Cormac Cashman, Fleming claims she “would have done things differently”. She says the “opening hours of many of the Welfare services are very limited and do not help those students who do not study on campus or have extended College hours.” Fleming plans to stretch the Welfare Office out to all of Trinity’s campuses, “as many students are not specifically based on Trinity’s campus”. Fleming points out that there were many last-minute changes on the Welfare calendar this year that she feels she would have done differently.

Entertainments

Keith Florea

“The Ents Officer is there for the students and I want to provide what the students want”, says Keith Florea. The Junior Sophister BESS student feels he is the one to “make the change” in the position of Entertainments Officer. He says the incumbent Ents Officer Mick Birmingham has “done well, but there is room for improvement”. As a member of Birmingham’s Ents team, Florea claims to have “seen first-hand the areas where Ents collapses, and I can be the one to fix this”.
Florea says there should be more variety in the Ents programme. He wants to cater for those students whose interests range from classical to heavy metal rock, by organising more trips away and creating a greater variety on nights out.
Some of Florea’s ideas include having a stronger student input through internet polls and more on-campus entertainment, with “students working together, and not just filling venues”. If elected, Florea says he will transform the Ents website into somewhere students and societies can visit to gain information on events.
Florea has ideas to create a summer festival in Trinity, similar to Oxegen in Kildare. He aims to make nights out and entertainment as affordable as possible to students, through discount vouchers and off-licence prices in nightclubs.
The proposed Student Centre is “absolutely vital”, according to Florea. “At present there is no such centre in the College, whereas the majority of colleges do have one”.
“The Pav is not a sufficient venue to have live gigs in terms of licensing. In order to bring more variety into the Ents programme, a running students centre is the key in order to achieve this.”
If elected, Florea would be taking on the renewal of the Trinity Ball contract, an area in which he insists “Trinity does have a say in. MCD are not the only promoters Trinity can use to run the event, and if necessary there are other promotion compnies around if the decision comes to exit their contract”. Florea says he feels the Students’ Union does not received adequate profits from the Trinity Ball. Florea is keen to have greater student involvement in the choice of acts at the Freshers’ Ball, as well as Trinity Ball, with a choice of up to four headliners.

Daragh Genockey

“I want bigger resources, with a bigger budget, on a bigger scale”, says Darragh Genockey, whose main aim as Entertainments Officer would be to “make student events better”.
Genockey describes himself as “Mick’s second in command”, and is an active member of current Entertainments Officer Mick Birmingham’s team. He says he took over from Birmingham when he was on holiday, becoming de facto Entertainments Officer for a week. He says the Ents crew is important as it enables students to “stay on from Mick and work up the ranks”. If elected, he would have a team of five to ten members to assist organising events. Genockey says he can “work with designers to get better deals” when advertising student nights out.
If elected, Genockey aims to create an “Entertainments management package”. This would involve working with societies and sports clubs in order to help them organise nights out and improve communication between events organisers across campus.
“We need more cooperation with societies, and more involvement with the Students’ Union. This doesn’t mean to say I want the SU to completely dominate”, says Genockey, who has “no interest in taking over whatsoever”. Genockey says organising events for the first time can be “overwhelming”, and “even doing little things like getting printing organised can be very difficult- like using the printers in Reads, for example, is a confusing process and something which the SU should be giving advice and information about”.
Genockey is involved in a number of College societies, and is Social Secretary for DUBES and the Cancer Society. He has also worked with the entertainments aspect of DU Players.
The BESS student says he has an interest in live music, and is a member of the Alternative Music Society. He aims to introduce music events to Trinity that go beyond the Trinity Ball and Freshers’ Ball, introducing a greater variety to student nights out. Genockey has been managing a Dublin-based band for the past three years, and organised a student gig night last Michaelmas Term.

Conor O’Toole

“My main selling point, is that I don’t do BESS”, says prospective Entertainments Officer Conor O’Toole. The Senior Freshman Engineering student says he will make sure all students have access to “free ents”. When asked how this would be funded, O’Toole explains that alcohol revenue would subsidise club charges, and, more specifically, that he doesn’t really care about money at all.
O’Toole is keen to encourage alternative music at College events, and says he wants to “get the Pixies in for Trinity Ball, if I wanted to see some band from Dublin I could go anywhere”. O’Toole is currently involved in publicity work for Trinity’s Alternative Music Society.
If elected, O’Toole would like to organise “Nudist getaways” for Trinity students, citing a number of suitable beaches across Ireland. O’Toole did not appear to have a plan to deal with the issue of legality.
“I’m definitely a tea man, and we should have a large on-campus tea room right here in Trinity”, says O’Toole, “It should have a range of different teas for students. You’ve got to remember that Ents isn’t just about organising club nights!”
O’Toole also claims that the answer to the question “what amkes him Ents?” is “being Ents” since 1991. One of his pipe-dream projects is to bring Pink Floyd to Trinity, including all the original band members. He believes that this will be possible with the aid of the genetics department to clone those band members who have passed away.
The Engineering Senior Freshman is currently involved in work as a comedian.
O’Toole is a Senior Engineer at Trinity FM, and is the Amenities and Facilities Officer for the Comedy Society. O’Toole is also involved with the Juggling Society. He currently works as a Sports Writer for The University Times.

Communications

Tom Lowe

Running unopposed, Tom Lowe is running for Communications Officer to become part of an “SU that communicates with you”.
Lowe praises current Officer, Rob Donohue, for his creation of the Students’ Union broadsheet newspaper, the University Times, although says he could “do more”. Lowe is keen to improve the role of the Office in managing communications with students, “using not just the newspaper and website but social media as well.” He says this could be used as a “platform for spreading Students’ Union policy and informing students more efficiently than just relying on class representatives”.
“Communications Officer is not just about being an Editor”, says Lowe, “we need to communicate to students on a College-wide and a national level, and online media is the perfect medium for this”. The Junior Sophister is currently Web Editor for the Trinity News, and has worked as a Copy Editor and Deputy Opinion Editor. If elected, Lowe wishes to replace written reports of Students’ Union councils which “no one reads” with video reports, “to inform the student body of where money is going”.
At the forefront of Lowe’s campaign is a bid to protect freedom of speech in Trinity. The Economics student is currently involved in The Piranha’s ongoing publicity campaign to ensure journalistic independence in the University. Lowe is currently Treasurer of Trinity Publications, where he is responsible for the finances of Trinity News, TCD Miscellany, and The Piranha.
Lowe has previously been a BESS class representative, and is a DUBES committee member along with holding the Librarian position for the Politics Society. He has professional experience with a PR firm, and feels this involvement “reflects the role of Communications”.

 
Election special: Presidential aspirations PDF Print
Written by Election Team   

Declan Harmon

If elected, Declan Harmon aims to prioritise accountability in the Students’ Union, and the graduate prospects of its members. He promises to cut the “wasteful spending of the Union”, and “focus its efforts on really fulfilling its role of standing up for the concerns of students and serving their needs”.
“Our Union is not delivering success for the money we are putting in to it”, says Harmon, who wants to make the Students’ Union “far more effective”. The BESS student comments: “We all contribute to the Union’s huge budget and I am consistently disappointed with the results. There are many good people involved in the Union, but collectively they are not producing good outcomes”.
Currently the Students’ Union have a budget of €400,000, of which 80 per cent comes from the Student Charge. Harmon aims to publish the income and expenditure of the Union on a monthly basis, and make the full accounts of the Union available to all students for inspection in his office.
“There are ways that the Students’ Union can help its members become more attractive to employers”, says Harmon, who is keen to improve graduate employment prospects in Trinity. He says this will be achieved by working on initiatives, such as making access to internship programmes easier, introducing mentoring programmes and an on-campus careers fair where students can meet potential employers. “I have presented proposals on this to the Minister for Social Welfare”, says Harmon, “and have discussed the issue with the business lobby group IBEC”.
Harmon is an outspoken critic of the incumbent Students’ Union. He cites the example of the “failed” Library campaign and the proposed Student Centre, which is “still just a dream and no closer to reality”. He describes the Buttery as “overpriced for the quality” and says, “College is determined to squeeze even more students into already overcrowded classes”.
Harmon says other Students’ Union candidates may paint him as the “outsider” in the bid for presidency. He says these nominees “have been maneuvering into the position for years now”.
“Well, I am an outsider, as are the vast majority of students who feel indifferent at best towards their Union”, says Harmon, who describes himself as “the candidate for those who want to take back their Union so that it works for all of us.”
Harmon is active in a number of voluntary and charitable organizations. He is treasurer of his local GAA club, Ballyfermot De la Salle. The Junior Sophister is involved in the Society of St. Vincent de Paul, and is member of the Board of Directors of Ballyfermot Family Resource Centre, which provides training and employment opportunities to people living in the Dublin 10 area. He is also a member of the Advisory Council of the European Movement in Ireland.
“Unemployment is a huge issue for us all”, explains Harmon, “Our Union can and should do more to prepare its members for the workplace”.

Fearghal Hughes

Fearghal Hughes is the only nominee concerned with the grant system in Ireland, which he describes as “fundamentally flawed”.  He says the grant system needs to be completely overhauled, in order to ensure students know exactly “how, when and where to obtain their grants”. 
Fearghal explains, “the grant system is currently evaluated on the basis of parental income, which doesn’t take into account students who support themselves independently, yet when they fill out the grant application form they still have to include their parents’ income”.  Hughes cites the example of the sit-in staged by UCD students in Wicklow County Council last October, in protest of the delay in receiving their maintenance grants.
Hughes praises Students’ Union President Cónán Ó Broin for “creating a profile for the Union on a national level”.  When asked if he would have done anything differently, he says Ó Broin has “done as much as he can”.  Hughes explains, “Cónán Ó has been kept incredibly busy with the issue of fees, and you can’t argue with results!”
The Senior Sophister from Drogheda says the Library issue has been as prominent as ever under Ó Broin, and hopes to continue the campaign for opening hours on a par with the national average.
“College have been spending our Registration Fee in some rather odd ways”, says Harmon, who points out that the Student Charge is paid for by students and, as such, should be more accountable.  He adds, “I would like to look into negotiating with fees, although this is off the table until the next general election”.
Hughes describes the Student Charge as “misspent” and “unacceptable” that students are not consulted into its expenditure.  “The Library, for example, should be funded by the Student Charge as a core service”, says Hughes, who expects the grant given to the Students’ Union to be publicly accountable as well.
Hughes is currently involved in the Students’ Union as Engineering, Maths and Sciences Faculty Executive and Convenor, which he says “definitely helps” in his presidential campaign.  His current position involves co-ordinating 83 class representatives, including helping them to organise class parties, create contacts and help with timetabling issues.  Hughes has also worked as a class representative, and stands on the committee of the Cancer Society and Comedy Society.
A Sports Writer for The University Times, Hughes was a member of the rugby team until he was injured.  Keen to create a “more approachable union”, Hughes wants to “ensure the sabbatical officers engage with students regularly face to face”, and tells Trinity News he encourages students: “don’t hesitate to stop and talk to me if you see me around campus!”




 

Nikolai Trigoub-Rotnem

Since his entry into Trinity College, Nikolai Trigoub-Rotnem has been heavily involved in the Students’ Union, and has been an Engineering class representative. His campaign is centred on four main issue areas: fees, grants, the library and sports facilities.
Trigoub-Rotnem feels strongly the the registration fee should not be increased, citing the importance of “outsider action”. He has been an active membr of the anti-fees campaign under Conán Ó Broin. Trigoub-Rotnem says he will aim to lobby TDs as soon as he begins his post, if elected. Trigoub-Rotnem says grant decreases were cut by 5 per cent in this year’s budget, which he is keen to reverse by “looking externally, we need to put pressure on members of the Daíl to get the Student Support Bill enacted.”
Trigoub-Rotnem is outspoken on reforming the Trinity Library, by introducing automated access into College and increasing Library opening hours, which he says may not necessitate an increase in Library staff. The Engineering with Management Junior Sophister is currently involved in the Students’ Union’s campaign for improved Library opening hours, which he says should be “on a par with the national average”.
He also seeks to create an indoor training sports centre, as space in the gym has become “increasingly restricted”. Trigoub Rotnem says, “it would be a place where teams can train together and improve team performance”.
Trigoub-Rotnem says this years Students’ Union officers have “set the bar which must be kept and raised”. He says the “external profile of this year’s Students’ Union is something which must be consolidated and built upon”, citing the fight against tuition fees which has become a nationwide issue. According to Trigoub-Rotnem, this year’s officers have “performed much better than previous years”. He points out that Trinity College had not seen a campus sit-in for ten years, before the Berkeley Library occupation last November. He says the big campaigns run by the Students’ Union this year are the largest they have been in years, attracing national attention.
Trigoub-Rotnem commends incumbent Union President Cónán Ó Broin, who he says has “done well, giving the Students’ Union a fresh thought and drive”.
However, he also says there is a need to increase the involvement of ordinary students into the Union, as many of Trinity’s 16,476 studentts know very little about the Union itself or the services they provide. He wants there to be a greater increase in the involvement of ordinary students into where money is spent, as presently students have no input into where funding is allocated.
Nikolai is also keen to fix what he sees as “failing” in ISS services. Unreliable printers is something which needs a “system of quality assurance in place to prevent breakdowns reoccurring”, says Trigoub-Rotnem.
Nikolai is on the executive board of the Students’ Union and is the Union’s Assistant Campaign Officer.

Dan Reilly

Self-described “Anglo-Irish Prodeshtant” Dan Reilly is making his bid for Students’ Union President as leader of what he describes as “the fastest growing political party in Trinity”: the Trinity Intellectual Traditionalist Society (TITS).
If elected, Reilly would abolish all Students’ Union elections, make it a “hate-crime” to criticise the Union, and create “draconian” Royal University Constabulary (RUC) with powers of “search arrest, interrogation of unruly students engaged in free thinking”.
“I shall abolish the Euro, which has been an infringement on Irish sovereignty since its introduction. British Sterling and the German Mark, pre-1948, are to be College tender”, explains Reilly, whose campaign also includes a bid to appoint Iris Robinson as ‘College Matron’.
Reilly plans to be actively involved in College entertainments, and will replace SHAG week with ‘Courtship with her Father’s Permission’ week. The Trinity Ball will be a chaperoned event, according to Reilly, who suggests a curfew of 10.30pm and English Baroque soloists as headliners. He plans to introduce a new form of entertainment, in which “female students from UCD will do naked cage-fighting wearing only ‘Ugg’ boots”. When asked how these students would be obtained, Reilly explains they would be “kidnapped” from the UCD campus, which he refers to as “Belfield polytechnic”. Reilly plans to ban the promotion of raves and events, describing student venues as “dens of iniquity”.
Reilly plans to abolish the office of Welfare, “with an officer responsible for ‘re-education’ and punishment”. He says students should be given “free condoms, if they have received less than 500 points on the Leaving Certificate”. Students receiving over 545 points, on the other hand, “will receive a manservant funded by the registration fee of all students”.
The student in History and Political Science wishes current Union President, Cónan Ó Broin, well as he comes to the end of his term: “The thing about Cónán is that he is really proud of his native language, culture and Gaelic games”, explains Reilly, “It makes one wonder why Cónán Ó Catholic chose to study at Trinity at all”. Reilly says he hopes Ó Broin and his “chairde” will not object to the reorganisation of the Gaelic Athletic Association to the Anglo Athletic Association: “Those who do object will be rounded up and transported immediately to the nearest NUI or Institute of Technology”. Reilly plans to  expel students with “improbable” Gaelic names. He cites “Ferdia”, “Aenus”, “Gobnait” and “Sneachta” as possible examples.
Reilly plans to introduce strict disciplinary measures into College, stating offenders “will be marched around campus wearing a dunce cap with the letters U.C.D. crudely written on it”. Reilly plans an overhaul of the Trinity Access Programme, whose candidates “are to be interviewed personally by the Union President”, adding, “they must be well groomed and proficient in Medieval Latin”.

 
Election special: Twelve candidates, twelve days PDF Print
Written by David Molloy   

It begins again: the promises, the campaigning, the stunts, the hustings, the polling, the count. Each year, a new selection of our fellow students step forward to represent each and every one of us in all negotiations with the college authorities. This year, as every year, the challenge is to select the best of what has been offered.
We have twelve candidates for election: four for President, three for Entertainments, two for Welfare, two for Education, and one uncontested election for Communications.
The presidential race, we can expect, will be fiercely fought as always. It is the office with the most prestige and the best opportunity for personal advancement of a given agenda. It is also an office of weighty responsibility– a union can succeed or fail at its goals depending upon the ability and leadership of a President. The vote cast for this office should be carefully considered: no matter any individual’s opinion of the effectiveness of student unions in general, the fact is that should any great threat to student activity arise, the union is recognised by college as the representative of the student body, and the President is its primary spokesperson.
Entertainments is less of a weighty concern, yet many students would place it as a much higher priority. Little can be said about this race: all three candidates hold experience, and it is up to the individual student to decide the relative merits of each.
The Education race is quite straightforward: a two-candidate head-to-head between Fox and Preston. Many may remember Preston from his failed attempt at President last year; the campaign he has proposed for the Education office is equally colourful.
Welfare is, perhaps, the most interesting race. The incumbent Welfare Officer, Cormac Cashman, has run for a second term of office– a rare event in Students’ Unions, and an even rarer one when running for the same position, rather than moving from one of the other positions to, say, President. His competition, Stephanie Fleming, is perfectly capable too, and so students are left with a simple decision when they cast the vote: are they convinced that Cashman has done an excellent job in his role, or is it time to elect some fresh blood? This race should be interesting to watch, as Cashman knows his strength lies in the words continuity, experience, and knowledge, and Fleming espouses change,  improvement, and stresses her own experience in dealing with people as a student of physiotherapy.
The race for Communications, is, of course, not a race: Tom Lowe stands unopposed. While the option always exists to vote to re-open nominations (or RON), such a vote is really only suited to the occasion when the only available candidate would be grossly unsuitable to the situation and would likely do harm in office.
Each category has good potential. Over the years, many of those involved in college life complain about “student apathy,” particularly in relation to the Union elections. Turnout is consistently low– years ago, the requirement for a certain proportion of the total population to make a valid poll was abandoned as it was no longer feasible. As students of the university, we should not feel as though this election is irrelevant. All continuing students will be affected by its results, whether that means a system one can rely on in an emergency, an excellent or exceptionally poor selection of entertainment next year, or a relatively harmless union which neither succeeds nor fails to any great extent.

What follows is a brief overview of every candidate. Familiarise yourself with them, and ask further questions at the hustings or of members of the various campaign teams. Read manifestos, and take part. Most of all, vote. The college is an insular community, and students are, for the most part, somewhat protected from the outside world: what happens in academic circles is, for many, more important than what happens in national government.

Polling Times:

Campus:
Tuesday February 16:         12.00–18.00
Wednesday February 17:     09.00–19.00
Thursday February 18:         09.00–16.00
D’Olier St:

Tuesday February 16:         11.00–14.00
Wednesday February 17:     15.00–18.00
St James:

Wednesday February 17:     12.00–15.00
Tallaght:

Wednesday February 17:     16.00–18.00
JCR Halls:

Monday February 15:         19.00– close
Count night:

Friday February 19, Montclare Hotel

Hustings:

Hustings take place during the campaign period, during which members of the student population may pose questions to the candidates. These will take place on:


February 9:         Froebel

February 12 13.30:    Goldsmith Hall

February 15 14.00:     Dining Hall Steps

February 15 1900:     JCR, Halls

Campaign Trail:

Campaigning officially began at 11pm on Sunday, February 7. It officially ends on February 18 at 4pm.

During this time, prospective sabbatical officers and their campaigning teams ordinarily promote themselves, through the media of posters, printed manifestos, and social media.

Flyers and printed material can only be handed directly to students, and not left in college locations. Any material found in this way may be confiscated.

There are strict financial limits in place for campaign teams, in order to prevent one or more wealthy candidates achieving a greater level of publicity or popularity by investing personal funds.

Candidates pays deposit of €50 at the beginning of the campaign to the Electoral Commission of the Students’ Union. This is only returned if the candidate secures a certain proportion of the vote. If it is not returned, the amount is donated to charity.

Polling takes place from February 17–19 within the main college areas, in the Hamilton and Arts Buildings. Voting is restricted to certain times on each day.

There is also a polling day at each affiliate college, such as Froebel and Marino.

Dates this year have been slightly modified due to a constitutional rewrite in the Union last year in addition to the advent of semesterisation.

The Electoral Commission has also tightened up its rules this year, adding clauses which define what constitutes the campaigning area, and ruling that current sabbatical officers must remain neutral throughout the campaign, unless they themselves are running.

 
Taking liberties PDF Print
Written by Thomas Raftery   
Thomas Raftery traces the historic aggregation of civil liberties in the USA, showing the scant regard for the principles on which their country was founded I imagine that it was with some trepidation that 40 English Barons accosted King John, bundled him into a rowing boat and took him out to Runnymede Island with the promise he would not be returned to the safety of the mainland until he had signed their “Great Charter of English Liberties”. More popularly known as the “Magna Carta” this was the first time legislation was forced onto a King by his subjects. Had it not been for the courage of this handful of noblemen to place the King under such duress that he signed the famous piece of yellowed parchment world history would read very differently from how it does today. Thomas Jefferson famously said that, “When the government is afraid of the people, there is liberty, but when the people are afraid of the government, there is tyranny”, and it was on this principle that the Barons of England hatched their plan over 700 years previously, the same principle that motivated leaders across Europe to convene as the “European Convention on Human Rights” in the wake of World War II. And it was the belief in this very same principle that brought together thousands of people in protest on the streets of London in April of last year. In 2006, defence lawyers representing Jose Padilla released footage of a group of masked guards, in full riot gear, entering his cell, shackling his arms and legs, forcing a hood, blackout goggles and industrial sound-proof earphones onto his head, and marching him down the corridor. If you didn’t know, you would be forgiven for assuming that Mr. Padilla poses an immediate threat to the lives of the guards, or is a maximum-security prisoner charged with high-profile acts of terrorism or mass murder, or is at least from some fearsome terrorist cell or army. These assumptions would be most tragically incorrect. Instead the footage shows Mr. Padilla, an American citizen accused of being an “enemy combatant” (and by means of this accusation, stripped of his civil liberties), being taken to the dentist. Perhaps Mr. Padilla’s warden most succinctly describes the level of threat he poses when he says that he is so docile and utterly inactive, that he could be mistaken for a “piece of furniture”. The purpose of these measures then, is not risk limitation, but rather to mercilessly maintain the conditions under which he has been held for the past four years: total sensory deprivation. Jose Padilla has lived in his blacked out cell, unable to hear or see anything beyond it, allowed no human contact whatsoever, if you overlook the occasional beatings. The forensic psychiatrist who examined him said that he “does not appreciate the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, is unable to render assistance to counsel, and has impairments in reasoning as a result of a mental illness, i.e. post-traumatic stress disorder, complicated by the neuropsychiatric effects of prolonged isolation”. By means of social isolation it appears that Mr. Padilla, against whom charges of building a dirty bomb were found to be spurious and dropped and replaced by something vaguer and to do with “conspiracy”, has been lobotomised. If the results weren’t so harrowing, you might marvel at the creative ability of human beings, after thousands of years of practise, to devise new and more effective ways of totally destroying each other. Of course Jose Padilla is not alone, but is one of thousands of men and women detained, without any charge other having the shady and legally indefinable characteristics of an “enemy combatant”, indefinitely. It seems to me a strange Christian country that believes in neither forgiveness nor redemption. The fact that the US (with the assistance of the UK) routinely and systematically tortures “enemy combatants” while prosecuting its “war on terror” is no longer even disputed. The Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project (DAA) has documented the abuse or killing of 460 inmates of US military prisons in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, and notes that this is a conservative figure considering the CIA’s ability to censor records, or move prisoners to one of its foreign oubliettes. The New York Times reported that prisoners at the Bagram airbase in Afghanistan were made to stand for up to 13 days with their hands chained to the ceiling, naked, hooded and unable to sleep. The abuse included rape, sexual humiliation, sleep deprivation and mock executions. The Washington Post alleges that prisoners at the same airbase were often “blindfolded, thrown into walls, bound in stressful positions, subjected to loud noises and deprived of sleep.” Though the instances of torture seem well documented, it is only thanks to the soldiers stupid enough to film the abuse that any record exists at all, and the DAA points out that no officer has yet been held accountable for the actions of his subordinates. Aside from the institutionalised torture that is an intrinsic part of the “war on terror”, the treatment of Mr. Padilla foregrounds another growingly popular incarceration technique: solitary confinement. Some 25,000 prisoners are currently held in isolation, and in some cases have been in this state for over 20 years. In the more extreme examples, solitary confinement can mean not seeing, hearing, or touching another human being for years at a time. At Pelican Bay in California where 1200 prisoners are held in isolation, over 10% are now in the psychiatric wing and the waiting list is growing. Dr. Henry Weinstein, a psychiatrist who studies prisoners in isolation, suggests that they suffer “memory loss to severe anxiety to hallucinations to delusions…people go crazy”. While they go in bad, they come out mad. Predictability, the reaction to these revelations by the conservative Right is “the ends justify the means”, or some similarly boring or hypothetical “Jack Bauer” situation where you can torture one to save a million. This reaction is of course completely ridiculous given the evidence that torture will eventually make anyone say anything. This behaviour can instead be understood in terms of power and control. It is the result of the discovery that under the right conditions, one man’s power over another is unlimited. As the journalist George Monbiot said, “it is an indulgence that turns its perpetrators into everything they claim to be confronting”. In the wake of 9/11, George Bush said that he was fighting against threats to the “values of civilised nations”. The true horror of terror is how it changes what a “civilised nation” will deem acceptable in the face of adversity, and if this is the routine abuse of prisoners, then I fear the change in our values may be irreversible. If this abuse continues, the terrorist’s mission to mutate our society so far from its principles will have been achieved. Bush charged his nation’s soldiers and interrogators to find where the evils of extremism are hidden. Perhaps they should congratulate themselves, as it appears they have succeeded – and they’re much closer to home than anyone might have thought.
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 6